US District Court for the District of Maryland Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 321 - 330 of 584
Ku-Washington Corporation v Golden Spring International Corp.
as 8:2011cv02903
Plaintiff:
Ku-Washington Corporation
Defendant:
Golden Spring International Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Trusted Systems, Inc. v. Trusted Federal Systems, Inc.
as 8:2011cv02883
Defendant:
Trusted Federal Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trusted Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Acorn Media Group, Inc. v. Magen et al
as 8:2011cv02734
Plaintiff:
Acorn Media Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Lawrence Magen and Acorn TV LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rasta Thomas, LLC v. Platypus Wear, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02701
Plaintiff:
Rasta Thomas, LLC
Defendant:
Platypus Wear, Inc. and Bad Boy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Basile Baumann Prost Cole & Associates, Inc. v. BBP & Associates LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02478
Plaintiff:
Basile Baumann Prost Cole & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
BBP & Associates LLC, Ralph Basile and James Prost
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
In-N-Out Burger v. Grab-N-Go Burgers
as 1:2011cv02296
Plaintiff:
In-N-Out Burger
Defendant:
Grab-N-Go Burgers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
International Aloe Science Council, Inc. v. Fruit of the Earth, Inc.
as 8:2011cv02255
Plaintiff:
International Aloe Science Council, Inc.
Defendant:
Fruit of the Earth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
First Mariner Bank v. Continuity Programs, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02211
Plaintiff:
First Mariner Bank
Defendant:
Continuity Programs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Maximum Life Labs, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02162
Plaintiff:
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Maximum Life Labs, LLC and E Health Fulfillment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Red Tomato, Inc. v. Bozkurt et al
as 8:2011cv02159
Plaintiff:
Red Tomato, Inc.
Defendant:
Alper Bozkurt, Red Tomato, LLC and Red Tomato 2 LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
