US District Court for the District of Maryland Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,895
Jubb v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00169
Plaintiff:
Lance Alan Jubb
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Colvin, Commissioner
as 1:2025cv00180
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Colvin
as 8:2025cv00154
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Carlos Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carman v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00129
Plaintiff:
Carrie Carman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Snead v. The Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00121
Plaintiff:
Sharaa Snead
Defendant:
The Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Malone et al v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2025cv00099
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gross v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00075
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crawford v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00076
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff:
Joyce Crawford
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pebbles v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2025cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Pebbles
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00094
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Theresa L. Stith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
