Maryland Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Miranda et al v. Homefix Remodeling Corp.
as 8:2022cv03190
Plaintiff:
Robin Ariel Miranda and Mary Jeanne Mauney
Defendant:
Homefix Remodeling Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Starling v. Clear Health LLC
as 1:2022cv02938
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Starling
Defendant:
Clear Health LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Financial Freedom Mortgage
as 1:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Antwane Johnson
Defendant:
Financial Freedom Mortgae
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Financial Freedom Mortgage, LLC
as 8:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Antwane Johnson
Defendant:
Financial Freedom Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nickson v. Quinstreet Inc.
as 8:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Beaufort Nickson
Defendant:
Quinstreet Inc. doing business as Insure.com
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dribben v. Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp.
as 1:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Dribben Douglas
Defendant:
Homefix Remodeling Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Long Fence and Home LLLP
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Antwane Johnson
Defendant:
Long Fence and Home LLLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Long Fence and Home LLLP
as 8:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Antwane Johnson
Defendant:
Long Fence and Home LLLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Keyonna Jones
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Keyonna Jones
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
