Maryland Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Varela
as 1:2013cv02233
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Defendant:
Jason Rogeljo Varela
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Hunt Valley Towne Centre, LLC
as 1:2013cv02160
Respondent:
Hunt Valley Towne Centre, LLC
Petitioner:
Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. Burhans et al
as 1:2013cv01803
Plaintiff:
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Defendant:
Winslow Burhans, Dorothy Burhans and A Testamentary TR ENT Share B
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
RSL Funding, rsl Funding, LLCLLC v. Wheeler
as 1:2013cv01721
Plaintiff:
RSL Funding, rsl Funding, LLCLLC
Defendant:
Donna Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
v. RSL Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01718
Defendant:
RSL Funding, LLC and Donna Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
MHM Services, Inc. v. Cline
as 8:2013cv01349
Plaintiff:
MHM Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Gloria Cline
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC et al v. Fesenko et al
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and VLS Securities LLC
Defendant:
Victor Fesenko, Nataliya Fesenko, CIP and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Zen Capital A/S et al v. Lund Trading, LLC
as 1:2013cv00780
Petitioner:
Zen Capital A/S and Trollbeads A/S
Respondent:
Lund Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Wisner v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Wisner
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mathis v. Goldberg et al
as 8:2012cv01777
Plaintiff:
Burman Y. Mathis
Defendant:
David S. Goldberg and Stuart Muntzing Skok
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
