Maryland Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 459
CEPHAS LOGISTICS v. FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INC.
as 1:2024cv02538
Plaintiff:
CEPHAS LOGISTICS
Defendant:
FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
CEPHAS LOGISTICS v. FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INC.
as 1:2024cv02540
Defendant:
FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INC.
Plaintiff:
CEPHAS LOGISTICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kirby v. Dejoy
as 1:2024cv02424
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Young v. Maraj-Petty
as 8:2024cv02279
Defendant:
Onika Tonya Maraj-Petty
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
McCullough v. Woodard et al
as 1:2024cv01982
Defendant:
Corey thomas hall and Shanai Woodard
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McCullough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Coley v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Dianna Coley
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Massenburg et al v. Tindle
as 8:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Lanie Nikes and Tony Massenburg
Defendant:
Doranna Tindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bodden v. Walsh, et al
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Levi M. Bodden
Defendant:
Town of Bel Air, Jessica Carpenter, Logan F. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Colossus Media, LLC v. Adalytics Research, LLC
as 8:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
Colossus Media, LLC
Defendant:
Adalytics Research, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bobulinski v. Raskin
as 8:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bobulinski
Defendant:
Jamie Raskin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
