Maryland Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 869
Sirna v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
Gary B Sirna
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Gramstad et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
James D Gramstad and Joni T Gramstad
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Yarngo v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 8:2024cv01795
Defendant:
Health Resources and Services Administration Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, National Center for Disaster Fraud and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Rachel Yarngo
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0101 Ethics in Government Act
Ferrara v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01718
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Okutuga v. Elrich
as 8:2024cv01700
Defendant:
Marc Elrich
Plaintiff:
Caroline Abisola Okutuga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Okutuga v. Davis
as 8:2024cv01701
Defendant:
Dereck E. Davis
Plaintiff:
Caroline Abisola Okutuga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Kraemer v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Kraemer
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morgan v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Andrea C Morgan
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Nosler v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Douglas J Nosler
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
McKernan v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Grant McKernan
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
