Maryland Labor Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 3,169
Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Pension Fund et al v. C&G Mechanical, LLC
as 1:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Pension Fund, Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Medical Fund, Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Training Fund and others
Defendant:
C&G MECHANICAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MEBA Pension Trust - Defined Benefit Plan et al v. DMC Marine, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
MEBA Pension Trust - Defined Benefit Plan, Adam Vokac and Edward Hanley
Defendant:
DMC Marine, LLC and Donjon Marine CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Indian Nation Fire Sprinkler, LLC
as 8:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
INDIAN NATION FIRE SPRINKLER, L.L.C. and Indian Nation Fire Sprinkler, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Firetek, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
FIRETEK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. Abbett Electric Corporation
as 8:2022cv03184
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and Trustees of the National Electrical Annuity Plan
Defendant:
Abbett Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. HCI Sprinkler Inc.
as 8:2022cv03167
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinker Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Spinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
HCI SPRINKLER INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
F. v. Board of Trustees MM&P Health & Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher F.
Defendant:
Cigna/Care Allies, Masters, Mates and Pilots Benefit Plan, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Badcaro v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 8:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Kibatu Badcaro
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Glass Facades, LLC
as 1:2022cv02942
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Painters & Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund, Trustees of the Painters & Allied Trades District Council No. 51 Joint Apprenticeship Training & Journeyman Education Program and others
Defendant:
Glass Facades, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Glass Facades, LLC
as 8:2022cv02942
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Painters & Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund, Trustees of the Painters & Allied Trades District Council No. 51 Joint Apprenticeship Training & Journeyman Education Program and others
Defendant:
Glass Facades, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
