US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Other Statutes Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 219
Tsai v. McDonald
as 1:2015cv11676
Plaintiff:
Molly Tsai
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PUM v. Roark et al
as 1:2015cv10769
Plaintiff:
Sovathy PUM
Defendant:
David Roark , Leon Rodriguez and Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Friends of Animals v. Phifer et al
as 3:2015cv30011
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
Paul Phifer and Dan Ashe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Tangney v. Burwell
as 1:2014cv14149
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Tangney
Defendant:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kashif v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv30180
Plaintiff:
Irfan Kashif
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
H and A Corporation v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv13783
Plaintiff:
H and A Corporation
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Las Americas Market, Inc v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2014cv13731
Plaintiff:
Las Americas Market, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Services, Northeast Region.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools v. Coakley
as 1:2014cv13706
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools
Defendant:
Martha Coakley and The Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Oxfam America, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
as 1:2014cv13648
Plaintiff:
Oxfam America, Inc.
Defendant:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Lowenthal v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv13631
Plaintiff:
Jason Philip Lowenthal
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and William Francis Galvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.