US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 680
Sun v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv11682
Plaintiff:
Ming Sun
Defendant:
Newport Construction Corporation and Joshua Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DeGregorio v. Bloom et al
as 1:2024cv11590
Plaintiff:
Anthony V. DeGregorio
Defendant:
George Bloom and Bankers Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gustafson v. Quirion, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv11581
Defendant:
Alain Quirion, Jr. and Transport Quwic Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chad Gustafson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Santos v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv11537
Defendant:
Robert Oliver and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Santos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Karakostas v. Markowitz
as 1:2024cv11517
Plaintiff:
JAMIE KARAKOSTAS
Defendant:
SHAYNA MARKOWITZ and SHAYNA QUATTROPANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Dicarlo v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv11456
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Alyson Dicarlo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kennedy-Dumont et al v. Williams
as 3:2024cv30076
Defendant:
Laura Williams
Plaintiff:
Claude Dumont and Stacey Kennedy-Dumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Castillo v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv30075
Plaintiff:
Ms. Nyasia Castillo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lashkari v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv11356
Defendant:
Larry D. Hill and Mayflower Transit, LLC
Plaintiff:
Reza Lashkari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Nunez v. Santos
as 3:2024cv30064
Plaintiff:
Vincente Nunez
Defendant:
Edwin Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
