Massachusetts Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 403
Baafi v. Valentine et al
as 1:2021cv11209
Plaintiff:
William AE Baafi
Defendant:
Wilson Valentine, Raj Singh and Pranav Nagrecha
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jean Pierre v. Woburn Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv11183
Plaintiff:
Steve M Jean Pierre
Defendant:
Woburn Police Department and Middle District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steiner et al v. eBay Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11181
Plaintiff:
Ina Steiner, David Steiner and Steiner Associates, LLC
Defendant:
eBay Inc., Progressive F.O.R.C.E. Concepts, LLC, Devin Wenig and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Baafi v. Gwinnett County Georgia
as 1:2021cv11145
Plaintiff:
William AE Baafi
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thyme v. The Republican Party et al
as 1:2021cv11023
Plaintiff:
Arthur Thyme
Defendant:
The Democratic Party and The Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly v. eBay Inc.
as 1:2021cv10944
Defendant:
eBay Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Series 17-04-631, LLC v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10553
Defendant:
Mckinsey & Company, Inc., United States and MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
Series 17-04-631, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Robinson v. Weisenberg et al
as 1:2021cv10397
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
Merrill and McGeary, Attorneys At Law, Robert Weisenberg and Suffolk County Constable's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaul, MD v. Boston Partners, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv10326
Defendant:
North Jersey Media Group Inc, Boston Partners, Inc, Robert Heary,MD and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saade v. Efron et al
as 1:2021cv10069
Defendant:
BEE Investments, LLC, Bruce Efron and Does
Plaintiff:
Jack Saade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
