US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Contract Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 5,980
Turri v. McLaren Health Care Corporation
as 2:2023cv13119
Plaintiff:
Kyle Turri
Defendant:
McLaren Health Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hall v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2023cv13076
Plaintiff:
Vivian Leigh Hall
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
Rogers v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2023cv13073
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lavarus Rogers
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and IRS, Commissioner of
Butch's Best, LLC v. Dan Schantz Farm & Greenhouses, LLC
as 2:2023cv13045
Plaintiff:
Butch's Best, LLC
Defendant:
Dan Schantz Farm & Greenhouses, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Santoki LLC v. Zulily LLC
as 2:2023cv13035
Plaintiff:
Santoki LLC
Defendant:
Zulily LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Langworthy v. Tuck et al
as 2:2023cv13016
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Matthew Tuck and Appellate Law Firm
Rooks v. Rushmore Servicing
as 5:2023cv12986
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Rooks
Defendant:
Rushmore Servicing
Framing Systems, Inc. v. Beztak Land Company et al
as 2:2023cv12981
Plaintiff:
Framing Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Beztak Land Company and Maple Elm Development Company II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor v. McLaren Health Care Corporation
as 2:2023cv12971
Plaintiff:
Linda Taylor
Defendant:
McLaren Health Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Selective Insurance Company of America v. MiG East, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12948
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
MiG East, LLC d/b/a MiG Construction, Paul Jenkins, Sr., Anita D. Washington-Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
