U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,739
Eight Mile Style, LLC et al v. LaFontaine Ford St. Clair, Inc.
as 2:2025cv10249
Plaintiff:
Eight Mile Style, LLC and Martin Affiliated, LLC
Defendant:
LaFontaine Ford St. Clair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2025cv10199
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2025cv10200
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2025cv10201
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2025cv10202
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2025cv10203
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Evans et al v. Robertson et al
as 5:2024cv13435
Defendant:
Dani Montana, Dani Monroe, Danielle Robertson, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sybrena Evans and Sybrena Kenan and Associates, Inc. d/b/a UNWINEWITHTEDDY
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Verch v. Fendt Builders Supply Inc.
as 2:2024cv13427
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
Fendt Builders Supply Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2024cv13383
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv13384
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
