U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,739
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv12577
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Chelsea Ventures, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv12579
Plaintiff:
Everly and Sons Music, Broadcast Music, Inc., Howe Sound Music Publishing LLC Doing business as Cypress Park Music and others
Defendant:
Paul Rutter, Frank Luscri, Perry Porikos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv12578
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Barsch v. PHRC Plymouth Inc.
as 4:2024cv12527
Plaintiff:
MARIE BARSCH
Defendant:
PHRC Plymouth Inc. Doing business as PHR Centers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv12356
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Smith v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv12213
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Danielle Robertson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11977
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11979
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11980
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11978
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
