US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 625
Nessel v. Darby Winery, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Darby Winery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Alexander v. Renner et al
as 1:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Alexander David
Defendant:
Scott Andrew Renner and VELO ASSOCIATES PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Thakur
as 1:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Shekhar Thakur
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Donthnier v. Honor Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Valeri Donthnier
Defendant:
Honor Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nessel v. Dundee Hills Wine Library, LLC
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Dundee Hills Wine Library, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Gutierrez Macias v. Jiminez Inerarity
as 1:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Yunisaday Gutierrez Macias
Respondent:
Jose Fernando Jimenez Inerarity and Jose Fernando Jiminez Inerarity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Lee v. United States Department of Treasury
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Keshia Marie Lee
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Baldwin Pattie Drug Store, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
BALDWIN PATTIE DRUG STORE, LLC and MATTHEW D. KRAWCZAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Postma
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy L. Postma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Postma
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy L. Postma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
