Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,214
Smith v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv12213
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Danielle Robertson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carilius Media, BV v. Board of Regents of Michigan State University
as 1:2024cv00825
Defendant:
Board of Regents of Michigan State University
Plaintiff:
Carilius Media, BV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 172.222.80.197
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 172.222.80.197
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 172.14.191.16
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.60.69.25
as 1:2024cv00794
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11976
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11977
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11978
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11979
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11980
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
