Minnesota Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Saladino v. Mad City Home Improvement, LLC
as 0:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Alisha Saladino
Defendant:
Mad City Home Improvement, LLC doing business as Mad City Windows & Baths
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Love v. Postech Fashion, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Michelle Love
Defendant:
Postech Fashion, Inc. doing business as Chicme
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
von Brandenfels v. LTL LED, LLC
as 0:2023cv02813
Plaintiff:
Alexander von Brandenfels
Defendant:
LTL LED, LLC doing business as Wolf River Electric
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Reed v. Viverant PT LLC
as 0:2022cv03043
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Reed
Defendant:
Viverant PT LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carpenter v. Judson Enterprises, Inc.
as 0:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Corey Carpenter
Defendant:
Judson Enterprises, Inc. doing business as K-Designers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Michaud v. Kohls Corporation
as 0:2022cv02550
Plaintiff:
Paul Michaud
Defendant:
Kohls Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Michaud v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
as 0:2022cv02551
Plaintiff:
Paul Michaud
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC doing business as Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Graham v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Chester C. Graham
Defendant:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of Minnesota/Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Love v. Built Brands, LLC
as 0:2022cv02318
Plaintiff:
Michelle Love
Defendant:
Built Brands, LLC doing business as Built Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Michaud v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 0:2022cv01395
Plaintiff:
Paul Michaud
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
