U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,304
Nicholas Services, LLC et al v. Cellco Partnership
as 3:2025cv00117
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Services, LLC d/b/a Nicholas Air and Nicholas John Correnti
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alex Truck Stop LLC v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00107
Plaintiff:
Alex Truck Stop LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Medical Center Phcy, LLC et al v. OptumRx, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00106
Plaintiff:
Medical Center Phcy, LLC and Winona Drugs, LLC
Defendant:
OptumRx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC v. City of Columbus, Mississippi et al
as 1:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Mississippi, The City of Columbus Planning Commission and The City of Columbus City Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Albright v. BankPlus
as 4:2025cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tommie Albright
Defendant:
BankPlus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al

as 3:2023cv00479
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Southaven R.V. Center, Inc. et al

as 3:2025cv00057
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jones and Barbara Jones
Defendant:
Southaven R.V. Center, Inc. d/b/a SOUTHAVEN RV & MARINE, Forest River, Inc., Larry Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.