Northern District of Mississippi Other Statutes Cases
Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Robinson v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
John Robinson
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Askew v. Crown Management, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jerry Askew
Defendant:
Crown Management, LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2
and others
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Hall v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 4:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Arlison L. Hall
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Scott v. Tupelo Auto Sales, Ltd.
as 1:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Gary Scott
Defendant:
Tupelo Auto Sales, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Boyd v. Belmont Housing Corporation
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Boyd
Defendant:
Belmont Housing Corporation
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Judd et al v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Judd , The Estate of Kevin Bowens
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Citibank, N.A.
as 4:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Percy Smith
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Case name Not on File
as 3:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Peter Bernegger (DO NOT FILE)
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
The Chiropractic Neurology Center of Tupelo et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
The Chiropractic Neurology Center of Tupelo , Chiropractic Neurology Consultant PC , William Barlow
and others
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Apple Medical Clinics, SC, John Does Entities 1-10
and others
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Dickerson v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00164
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wil Dickerson
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.