US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,321
Turner v. King et al
as 1:2020cv00105
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Sup. Ronald King
Petitioner: Johnny Turner
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearn v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 1:2020cv00097
Respondent: State of Mississippi, Marshall Turner
Petitioner: Michael Henry Hearn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Arbuthnot
as 3:2020cv00140
Respondent: Teresa Arbuthnot
Petitioner: Jimmy Lee Davis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Williams
as 3:2020cv00139
Petitioner: James Earnest Watts
Respondent: Jessie J. Williams
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payton v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00098
Respondent: Josh Davis
Petitioner: Glen Payton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00084
Respondent: Joshua Davis
Petitioner: Christopher Thompson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randle v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00069
Respondent: Joshua Davis
Petitioner: Theotis Randle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. Williams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00055
Respondent: Jessie Williams
Petitioner: Juan Morales
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wrenn v. Middlebrooks We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00094
Respondent: Scott Middlebrooks
Petitioner: John E Wrenn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nixon v. Pearl River County
as 3:2020cv00091
Petitioner: Melvin Nixon, Jr.
Respondent: Pearl River County
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?