District of Mississippi Torts - Property Cases
Other Fraud Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Anderson Holdings, Inc. et al v. Cyclebar Franchising, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Anderson Holdings, Inc. , Leslie Anderson Suit
Defendant:
Cyclebar Franchising, LLC, St. Gregory Development Group, LLC, John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Edwards v. Bank Plus et al
as 3:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Bank Plus
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Farm Bureau Bank, FSB v. Freeman et al
as 2:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Farm Bureau Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Craig Freeman, Kimberly Freeman, Nina Welch
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Account Receivable
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Varnell Framing Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Varnell Framing Contractors, Inc., Anthony J. Varnell
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
McInnis et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Neill McInnis , J. Scott Archer
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Edwards v. Shells Gas Station et al
as 3:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Shells Gas Station, Citgo, Kangaroo Express
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Tort Action
Edwards v. Holmes County Child Support Office
as 3:2017cv00979
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Holmes County Child Support Office
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Edwards v. Shell Gas Station, et al
as 3:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Shell Gas Station, Citgo, Kangaroo Express
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Edwards v. Bank Plus
as 3:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Bank Plus
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Edwards v. Xerox
as 3:2017cv00977
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Xerox
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
