US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,220
Watson v. Colvin
as 4:2024cv01700
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Lakisha Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Petty v. Colvin
as 4:2024cv01677
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Larry Petty
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Colvin
as 4:2024cv01678
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gohn v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Dawn Gohn
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Myer v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01547
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Myer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hiatt v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01544
Plaintiff:
Victoria Hiatt
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Young v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01531
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gayle Young
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mason v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01474
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Willis Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Capelton v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01478
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenneth Capelton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hicks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
David Hicks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
