U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,229
Toler v. King
as 4:2025cv00150
Plaintiff:
Janice Barbara Toler
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Draper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2025cv00126
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Draper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barron v. King
as 2:2025cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M. Barron
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barron v. King
as 4:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M. Barron
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keil v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00068
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Keil
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wegleitner v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00064
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kimber Wegleitner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jahic v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00038
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Zejna Jahic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Conardy v. Colvin
as 4:2024cv01735
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Melinda Ann Conardy
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Roach v. Colvin
as 2:2024cv00108
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Natasha Roach
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Watson v. Colvin
as 4:2024cv01700
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Lakisha Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.