U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,518
Wheatley v. Bisignano
as 3:2025cv05057
Plaintiff:
Gail C. Wheatley
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pearce v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv05055
Plaintiff:
Gary Pearce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Yazel v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv00510
Plaintiff:
Michelle Renee Yazel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Swope v. Bisignano
as 5:2025cv06121
Plaintiff:
Megan Marie Swope
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stultz v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00502
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Blanche Stultz
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00483
Plaintiff:
Mark Evan Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kenny v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2025cv06120
Plaintiff:
Amber Deann Kenny
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Knight v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00481
Plaintiff:
Dara Ann Knight
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Samuels v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv05053
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Samuels
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burr v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv00473
Plaintiff:
Samantha A. Burr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.