District of Missouri Intellectual Property Cases

Trademark Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 566
Affiliated Acceptance Corporation v. Front Desk, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00932
Plaintiff: Affiliated Acceptance Corporation
Defendant: Front Desk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Caleres, Inc. v. Daden Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01281
Plaintiff: Caleres, Inc.
Defendant: Daden Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Energizer Brands, LLC v. Batteroo, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01232
Plaintiff: Energizer Brands, LLC
Defendant: Batteroo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
NRRM, LLC v. AA Auto Warranty, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv01190
Plaintiff: NRRM, LLC
Defendant: AA Auto Warranty, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Trademark
Dent Perfect, LLC d/b/a HAILUSA et al v. USA HAIL LLC et al
as 6:2016cv03295
Plaintiff: Dent Perfect, LLC d/b/a HAILUSA , Jeffrey E. Jones
Defendant: USA HAIL LLC, Dennis J. Sanders, II, John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fermented Projects, LLC v. The Modern Brewery, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01163
Plaintiff: Fermented Projects, LLC
Defendant: The Modern Brewery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
John Beal, Inc. v. Roofpros, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01151
Plaintiff: John Beal, Inc.
Defendant: Roofpros, Inc., Web.com Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
John Beal, Inc. et al v. Roofpros, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01149
Plaintiff: John Beal, Inc., Web.com Group, Inc.
Defendant: Roofpros, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Meissner v. Erickson
as 4:2016cv00755
Plaintiff: Callahan A Meissner
Defendant: Christian Erickson
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Phase 2, LLC v. Salco, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00986
Plaintiff: Phase 2, LLC
Defendant: Salco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?