Montana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,065
Linwood v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00091
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Sheriff Linder, Probation and Parole
and others
Petitioner:
Eugene Allen Linwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gable v. Hansen
as 6:2020cv00052
Petitioner:
Michelle Coller Gable
Respondent:
Jennie Hansen, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. United States
as 1:2020cv00084
Defendant:
United States
Petitioner:
Mitchell James Chandler
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hanson
as 9:2020cv00083
Petitioner:
Dale Michael Hanson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cheetham v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2020cv00050
Respondent:
State of Montana, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Petitioner:
Timothy Cheetham, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michaelson v. Young et al
as 4:2020cv00048
Petitioner:
Ryan Michaelson
Respondent:
Richard J. Young, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demarie v. Michael et al
as 6:2020cv00048
Respondent:
Lynn Guyer, Reginald D. Michael
Petitioner:
Darren C. Demarie
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Warden Bloodworth et al
as 6:2020cv00047
Respondent:
Warden Bloodworth, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Watts
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2020cv00075
Petitioner:
Anthel LaVan Brown
Respondent:
State of Montana, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillingham v. State of Montana
as 9:2020cv00074
Respondent:
State of Montana
Petitioner:
Richard W. Gillingham
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
