District of Montana Prisoner Petitions Cases
General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 923
Torres v. McGee et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Petitioner:
Franco Leo Torres
Respondent:
Devon McGee, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clary v. Fox et al
as 4:2018cv00085
Petitioner:
Charles Clary
Respondent:
Tim Fox, Mike McGraph, All District Court Judges
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Judge Haynes
as 9:2018cv00104
Petitioner:
Bryce J. Walker
Respondent:
Judge Haynes
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buehl v. Fox et al
as 6:2018cv00070
Petitioner:
Lanny Wade Buehl
Respondent:
Tim Fox, R. Jones
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ritesman v. Salmonson et al
as 9:2018cv00093
Petitioner:
Timothy Eric Ritesman
Respondent:
James Salmonson, Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Petitioner:
Marlon Thomas
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2018cv00092
Petitioner:
Marlon Thomas
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nordholm v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
William J. Nordholm
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eva v. O'Fallen et al
as 2:2018cv00032
Petitioner:
Raymond Joseph Eva
Respondent:
Dan O'Fallen, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kittrell v. Johnson et al
as 9:2018cv00086
Petitioner:
Toby Kittrell
Respondent:
Marc Johnson, Heather Smith, Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
