Montana Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.
as 9:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
PLAINTIFF v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv90001
Plaintiff:
TEST PLAINTIFF
Defendant:
Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Frost v. BNSF Railway Company
as 9:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Frost
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Dawes v. Montana Rail Link
as 1:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard Dawes
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Cox v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
as 4:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
Glenn L. Cox
Defendant:
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 1:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Paul Green
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
Paul Green and The Montana Department of Labor & Industry
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
United Transportation Union Local 15 et al v. Mair Holdings et al
as 1:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
United Transportation Union Local 15 and Phoenix Acquisitions
Defendant:
Mair Holdings, Mair Holdings, Big Sky Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Frank et al
as 6:2005cv00059
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Battles v. Montana Rail Link,
as 1:2005cv00100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.