US District Court for the District of Nevada Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,590
Earley v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00299
Plaintiff: Marc Anthony Earley
Defendant: NDOC, Cooke and NDOC IG's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santistevan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01042
Petitioner: Jerry Santistevan
Respondent: Marven Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Shooting et al
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff: Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant: A Shooting, Cornfield, Kirk Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. N.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00298
Petitioner: Terrance E. Williams
Respondent: N.D.O.C., Russel, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iske v. H.D.S.P. et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff: Harlan Iske
Defendant: H.D.S.P., H.D.S.P. Medical Staff, Sonya Corriton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00294
Plaintiff: Terrance Williams
Defendant: Miller, Brendel and Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff: Michael T. Williams
Defendant: Michael Minev, R. Donnelly, B. Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Icenberg
as 3:2022cv00296
Plaintiff: Adrian Aguirre
Defendant: Icenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mingo v. City of North Las Vegas
as 2:2022cv01016
Plaintiff: DeAndre Mingo
Defendant: City of North Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Slave-Noose et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff: Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant: Slave-Noose, J Claudid-Bil, Lance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?