US District Court for the District of New Jersey Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 900
KELLY v. NEW BRUNSWICK PARKING AUTHORITY
as 3:2024cv10706
Plaintiff:
TERRISON KELLY
Defendant:
NEW BRUNSWICK PARKING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RINALDO v. ALCHEMER LLC
as 2:2024cv10590
Plaintiff:
FRANK RINALDO
Defendant:
ALCHEMER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
RAUF v. THIBAUT INC
as 2:2024cv10443
Plaintiff:
ROBIN RAUF
Defendant:
THIBAUT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MATIAS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv10328
Plaintiff:
ROGER MATIAS
Defendant:
ABBOTT POINT OF CARE, INC., ABC COMPANIES 1-5, ALLISON SIRCHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HELMIG v. BURLINGTON STORES, INC.
as 1:2024cv10115
Plaintiff:
MOLLY HELMIG
Defendant:
BURLINGTON STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
LEE v. HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2024cv09652
Defendant:
HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
JIN LEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
HIGHSMITH v. CAREPOINT HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv09504
Defendant:
JESSICA MAGNOTTA, CAREPOINT HEALTH, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NASHIMA HIGHSMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
MCGILL v. HIGH HOTELS, LTD et al
as 1:2024cv09472
Defendant:
HIGH HOTELS, LTD, JOHN DOES 6-10 and JOHN DOES 1 through 5
Plaintiff:
MORGAN MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
MCGILL v. HIGH HOTELS, LTD et al
as 3:2024cv09472
Plaintiff:
MORGAN MCGILL
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10, HIGH HOTELS, LTD and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
COLLINS v. DOLGENCORP, LLC
as 1:2024cv09444
Plaintiff:
GREGORY COLLINS
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, LLC doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
