New Jersey Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,303
MCFARLAND v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2025cv02981
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ANN MCFARLAND
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ISAQ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv02791
Plaintiff:
BABIKER ISAQ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MERRITT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv02811
Plaintiff:
SHERRON MERRITT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ASADURIAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv02757
Plaintiff:
KARNIG ASADURIAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CARELLA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2025cv02747
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. CARELLA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MILES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2025cv02736
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN R MILES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
MILES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv02736
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN R MILES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
LUTES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2025cv02373
Plaintiff:
PAUL RONALD LUTES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MASTERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2025cv02189
Plaintiff:
PAULA A MASTERS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CASTRO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv02182
Plaintiff:
JOSE CASTRO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.