New Jersey Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,737
LOUGLOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv02893
Plaintiff:
ODYSSEAS LOUGLOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PISANI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
TODD PISANI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DIZON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv02701
Plaintiff:
GALAHAD M. DIZON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CITTA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv02626
Plaintiff:
RONALD CITTA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FAHRION v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv02503
Plaintiff:
DONNA FAHRION
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv02510
Plaintiff:
KAREN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EARLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv02514
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EARLEY and THOMAS E. EARLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
TIMBERMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
MICHELE TIMBERMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
OBANNER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv02147
Plaintiff:
MARVIN OBANNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCOTT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv02080
Plaintiff:
CELESTINE SCOTT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
