New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,109
PINSKY v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv20375
Petitioner: ROBERT PINSKY
Respondent: DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv20362
Petitioner: NATHANIEL PARKS
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and GOVENER OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MELLS v. ROYCE
as 2:2021cv20363
Petitioner: ANDRE MELLS
Respondent: RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2021cv20335
Petitioner: MARCUS ST. CLAIRE WHITE
Respondent: RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CAPOZZI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv20262
Petitioner: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN LAMINE N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SINGH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2021cv20201
Petitioner: HARPAL SINGH
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARVAIZ v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2021cv20195
Petitioner: KASHIF PARVAIZ
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LUNDY v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv20184
Petitioner: STEVEN LOVE LUNDY
Respondent: KATHY BRITTAIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv20165
Petitioner: ROBBY R. WILLIS
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAZEL v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv19981
Petitioner: JUSTIN HAZEL
Respondent: ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?