New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 7,965
VILLAFANA v. ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv22558
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNION COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NAVARRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUINONES SAVINO v. KAZLAU et al
as 2:2023cv22594
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MICHAEL QUINONES SAVINO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KAZLAU, MELAGIOUS CAMECHO ESQ, MARK MUSELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERMAN v. SCOTT ETIAL et al
as 2:2023cv22559
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT ETIAL, BROWN and DILLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENTZ v. DILL et al
as 3:2023cv22490
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
RYAN DILL, LOUIS DEDONNO, DAVID SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv22469
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP JAYSON GONZALEZ
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, OFFICER GUZMAN, OFFICER BUENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINHO v. CURRY et al
as 3:2023cv22430
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTINHO
Defendant:
JUDGE MATTHEW CURRY and PROSECUTOR STEVEN DUNBAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNINO v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv22373
Plaintiff:
VITO MANNINO
Defendant:
DR. COLLINS and JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISE v. POLICE et al
as 3:2023cv22323
Plaintiff:
RANDAL L. WISE
Defendant:
POLICE, FBI and AUSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NJDOC
as 2:2023cv22374
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN JONES
Defendant:
NJDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. FERMIN et al
as 2:2023cv22346
Plaintiff:
DERRICK Z HOWARD
Defendant:
OFFICER MARIO FERMIN and HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
