New Jersey Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed
Cases 221 - 230 of 504
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $751,387.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 3:2012cv03276
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $751,387.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY , ASSORTED JEWELRY VALUED AT $89,730.00 and ASSORTED COLLECTORS ITEMS VALUED AT $12,830.00
Claimant: ARSALAN A. AHMED , SAIMA ARSALAN and SAIMA ARSALAN ONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $36,710.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2012cv03174
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $36,710.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EICHNER et al
as 1:2012cv02697
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN EICHNER and KELLI A. EICHNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2008 BLACK AUDI A8 BEARING VIN: WAULV94E88N009405
as 2:2012cv02695
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 2008 BLACK AUDI A8 BEARING VIN: WAULV94E88N009405
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $105,164.79 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY COMPRISED OF: et al
as 2:2012cv02343
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $105,164.79 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY COMPRISED OF, $63,129.06 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 3981529788 IN THE NAME AND/ OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALI SIYAM AT TD BANK, $20,235.73 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 3982419376 IN THE NAME AND/ OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALI SIYAM, ZAIED SIYAM, AND ROUQIYYAH SIYAM AT TD BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL ARTICLES OF OTHER-SONIC GENERIC ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION GEL, WHETHER LABELED OR UNLABELED, IN ANY SIZE OR TYPE OF CONTAINER, THAT ARE IDENTIFIED BY LOT NUMBER, OR BY OTHER MEANS, AS HAVING BEEN MA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02264
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALL ARTICLES OF OTHER-SONIC GENERIC ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION GEL, WHETHER LABELED OR UNLABELED, IN ANY SIZE OR TYPE OF CONTAINER, THAT ARE IDENTIFIED BY LOT NUMBER, OR BY OTHER MEANS, AS HAVING BEEN MA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $418,671.13 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, COMPRISED OF: $82,290.00 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN SOVEREIGN BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT NUMBER 1222027041; $119,269.84 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN TD BAN
as 3:2012cv02204
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $418,671.13 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, COMPRISED OF: $82,290.00 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN SOVEREIGN BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT NUMBER 1222027041; $119,269.84 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN TD BAN
Claimant: KEVIN GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $263,327.95, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01914
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $263,327.95, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, $19,585.95 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 4760472715 IN THE NAME AND/OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF STEVE CHAN AT TD BANK, LOCATED AT 2265 MORRIS AVENUE, UNION, NEW JERSEY, $17,742 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 1261828151 IN THE NAME AND/OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF STEVEN N. CHAN AT SOVEREIGN BANK, LOCATED AT 745 BROAD STREET, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY and others
Claimant: STEVE N. CHAN
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $5,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2012cv01823
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $5,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant: DOCLAR CASTILLO
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $133,985.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN TD BANK NA PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 4259445075 HELD IN THE NAME OF LYLA HASSAN
as 3:2012cv01423
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $133,985.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN TD BANK NA PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 4259445075 HELD IN THE NAME OF LYLA HASSAN
Claimant: LYLA HASSAN
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?