US District Court for the District of New Mexico Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 560
McMullin v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Bobbie McMullin
Defendant:
E. Bravo, Lupe Martinez and G.E.O.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv01085
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Smith, Michael A. Fisher, Ruben R. Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, FNU Lopez, Melissa Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Tenna et al
as 1:2011cv01086
Plaintiff:
John D. Ramos
Defendant:
FNU Tenna, FNU Jojola and Julieann Stengel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muniz v. Moore et al
as 1:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
Frank M Muniz
Defendant:
Jim Moore, FNU LNU, Donald A Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wishneski v. Lea County Detention Center et al
as 2:2011cv01057
Plaintiff:
Johnathan D. Wishneski
Defendant:
Lea County Detention Center, FNU LNU and FNU Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pieri v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Pieri
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc. , William Shannon, Leopolo Raschbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linton v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2011cv01058
Plaintiff:
George Linton
Defendant:
FNU Mendoza, FNU Polutnik, FNU Bearden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. Trujillo et al
as 1:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Daniel O'Neill
Defendant:
Ralph Trujillo, Tom Clayton and Present Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becker v. Bernalillo County Sheriff et al
as 1:2011cv01019
Plaintiff:
Dion A. Becker
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Sheriff, Bernalillo County Detention Center, Ramon Rustin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayton v. Lopez
as 1:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Gayton
Defendant:
James Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
