US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 13,991
Jiang v Central Government of China et al
as 1:2024cv06707
Defendant:
Central Government of China and Ministry of Public Security of P.R. China, Hong
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. Dongsheng et al
as 1:2024cv06710
Defendant:
Li Dongsheng and Belle Roller
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. Mo
as 1:2024cv06713
Defendant:
Lifang Mo
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. World Journal
as 1:2024cv06783
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
World Journal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yourman v. Brooklyn Public Library et al
as 1:2024cv06787
Defendant:
Police Officer Ruiz (Badge # 3331), Brooklyn Public Library and New York Police Department
Plaintiff:
Zev Yourman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gilkes v. Diamond Resorts et al
as 1:2024cv06714
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts and The Hilton Grand Vacations
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Yourman v. New York Police (NYPD) et al
as 1:2024cv06786
Plaintiff:
Zev Yourman
Defendant:
New York Police (NYPD), Police Officer J. Doe 2 and Police Officer J. Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tavarez v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv06640
Defendant:
NYPD Officers John and Jane Doe One Through Ten and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tavarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Austin III
as 1:2024cv06613
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maita v. New York Fire Department et el
as 1:2024cv06559
Defendant:
New York City Fire Department and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Maita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
