US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 191 - 200 of 147,049
Gutierrez v. Recognition Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv03999
Plaintiff:
Alonso Gutierrez
Defendant:
Recognition Systems, Inc. and Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gutierrez v. Recognition Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03999
Plaintiff:
Alonso Gutierrez
Defendant:
Recognition Systems, Inc. and Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dyson et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03981
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dyson and Kathleen Dyson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Davis et al v. Exactech, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03983
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth J Davis and Terry R Davis
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rice et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03986
Plaintiff:
Rick Rice and Deborah Rice
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parrish v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03991
Plaintiff:
Brenda Parrish
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America et al v. Roth et al
as 1:2024cv03987
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Leopoldo Garden
Defendant:
Alan R Roth, Nellie Perez Roth, Kew Gardens Family Physicians, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Harris
as 1:2024cv03974
Plaintiff:
Gary Harris and ny city
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Glanville v. Chex Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03992
Plaintiff:
Maurice Glanville
Defendant:
Chex Systems, Inc. and Discover Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
