US District Court for the Northern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,738
Barzee v. Shelley
as 9:2024cv01488
Respondent:
Tobias Shelley
Petitioner:
Saio Barzee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charlotten v. People of the State of NY
as 9:2024cv01491
Respondent:
People of the State of N.Y.
Petitioner:
Brandon J. Charlotten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Safran v. Superintendent
as 9:2024cv01439
Petitioner:
David Jeffrey Safran
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Warden of FCI Ray Brook
as 9:2024cv01411
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Ray Brook
Petitioner:
Vincente Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orsell v. Spychalski et al
as 9:2024cv01389
Respondent:
Lucas Nellis, James P. Riley, Esq., Traci DiMezza and others
Petitioner:
Kayla Orsell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maurer v. St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility
as 9:2024cv01269
Petitioner:
Michael Maurer
Respondent:
St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharlow v. McIntosh
as 9:2024cv01196
Petitioner:
Keith Sharlow
Respondent:
Donita McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Dinapole
as 9:2024cv01200
Petitioner:
Gregory Franklin
Respondent:
Thomas Dinapole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Board of Parole
as 9:2024cv01177
Petitioner:
William Michael Hall
Respondent:
Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Rickard
as 9:2024cv01170
Respondent:
E. Rickard
Petitioner:
Jamal Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
