US District Court for the Western District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,903
Anderson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Anderson
Defendant:
State of New York, City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. N.Y.S. Division of Parole et al
as 6:2024cv06050
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
N.Y.S. Division of Parole and Parole Officer Gronau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caruso v. Lamanna et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Caruso
Defendant:
Superintendent Amy Lamanna and Dr. Christopher Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundscho v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv06032
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bundscho
Defendant:
Chief C. Green, William Whalen and Erie County Jain/Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. New York State Parole
as 6:2024cv06026
Plaintiff:
Carl Norton, Sr.
Defendant:
New York State Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Panessa et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Lamont Brown
Defendant:
Sgt. Panessa, Erie County Medical Center, Niagara County Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Fordham
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Ms. Anne L. Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Grant H. Monroe
Defendant:
U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Hanick Hall Medical Department
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Antonio Hogan
Defendant:
Hanick Hall Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06002
Plaintiff:
Drevon Hall
Defendant:
Todd Baxter and Deputy Latona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
