New York Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 29,636
RSS Feed | View as table
Mazgajewski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff: Brandon S Mazgajewski
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vescovi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff: John Joseph Vescovi
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Szczygielski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff: Denise Szczygielski
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Seniuk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff: Mark Seniuk
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06241
Plaintiff: Brian Samuel Sick
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arthur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03074
Plaintiff: Nazir Arthur
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03075
Plaintiff: Migdalia E Connolly
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Magill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff: Cody D. Magill
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Amato v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03038
Plaintiff: Robert John Amato
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ulitto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff: Thomas Ulitto
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?