New York Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 29,752
Rogan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff: Matthew Rogan
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Geary v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Kimberly Geary
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00411
Plaintiff: Tarsha J. Brown Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffin Oette v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06260
Plaintiff: Carmella Griffin Oette
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hanson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff: Kimberly D. Hanson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wrobleski v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00587
Plaintiff: Rebecca Wrobleski
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00596
Plaintiff: Courtney Sara Miller
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03367
Plaintiff: Shawn T. Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff: Daniel Jackson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romanyk v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff: Christopher Peter Romanyk
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?