New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Escobar v. New York State et al
as 2:2013cv01636
Defendant:
Gregory Blas, County of Suffolk, Mark Epley and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Escobar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Bias et al
as 2:2013cv01503
Defendant:
Gregory Bias, Mark Epley, Southampton Town Police and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bullock v. Bias et al
as 2:2013cv01505
Defendant:
Gregory Bias, Mark Epley, Southampton Town Police and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kee v. Bias et al
as 2:2013cv01504
Defendant:
Gregory Bias, County of Suffolk, Mark Epley and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Blas et al
as 2:2013cv01506
Defendant:
Gregory Blas, County of Suffolk, Mark Epley and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briggs v. Bias et al
as 2:2013cv01501
Defendant:
Gregory Bias, County of Suffolk, Mark Epley and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Resto v. Biass et al
as 2:2013cv01301
Defendant:
Gregory Biass, Mayor Mark Epley, Southampton Town Police and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Resto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benton v. Biass et al
as 2:2013cv01310
Plaintiff:
Albert Benton
Defendant:
Gregory Biass, John/Jane Doe, Mayor Mark Epley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bullard v. Biass et al
as 2:2013cv01303
Defendant:
Gregory Biass, Mayor Mark Epley, Southampton Town Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bullard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chen v. Warden

as 1:2013cv00221
Petitioner:
John E. Chen
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.