US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,981
Ernst v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Cody Ernst
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Kellie Jackson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
McArthur v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tonya McArthur
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Evans v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ernest Evans
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Scialdone v. O'Malley DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 4:24-CV-82-M-RJ.
as 2:2024cv00031
Defendant:
William Robert Scialdone and Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Scialdone v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
William Robert Scialdone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lane v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Billy Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Christie Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
