US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 376
Raymer v. Riley Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
Tommy Raymer
Defendant:
Riley Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Raymer v. Riley Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Tommy Raymer
Defendant:
Riley Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kemp v. Saertex USA, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00385
Defendant:
Saertex USA, LLC and Saertex multiCom LP
Plaintiff:
Rahim Kemp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Shoemaker v. ONYX Environmental Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Nicole Danielle Shoemaker
Defendant:
ONYX Environmental Solutions, Inc. , Jeremy Hahne and Lutz F. Hahne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Matthews et al v. Convergys Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Carla Matthews , Lisa Worrills and Gary Cosby
Defendant:
Convergys Corporation and Convergys Customer Management Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
McConnell v. Revels Contracting Services, Inc
as 3:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
James Frank McConnell
Defendant:
Revels Contracting Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nereim v. Premara Financial, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Melissa Nereim
Defendant:
Premara Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Agyei et al v. Express Catering, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kwame A Agyei , Etchien Kouaho , Ladjebe R Lare and others
Defendant:
Express Catering, Inc. and Frank Fumich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hunt et al v. Kim
as 3:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
Anna Hunt and Leandra Ramkissoon
Defendant:
Misun Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Turner v. Newton Conover City Schools et al
as 5:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ericia Turner
Defendant:
Newton Conover City Schools, Newton Conover City Board of Education and Barry Redmond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
