North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,176
Wilson v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Wilson
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kagley v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Dylan Kagley
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montano v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Adrian Montano
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillippi v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Haley Phillippi
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shaw v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Debra Delores Shaw
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ogan v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 7:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ogan
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nielsen v. Merck & Co.
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Juniaus Nielsen and Junious Nielsen
Defendant:
Merck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bethel v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
BETHEL N. MARYAH and Maryah N. Bethel
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cates v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Braelyn Cates
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.