North Dakota Social Security Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 254
Wagner v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wagner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Quinn v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dustin Roger Quinn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Langsdon v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sherry Langsdon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kelbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00036
Plaintiff:
Emily I. Kelbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fowler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00022
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sheila A. Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lundby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Johna L. Lundby
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Skoog v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Nikki Rae Skoog
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Emerson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Emerson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Van Wechel v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Marc Van Wechel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peck v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Peck
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
