Northern District of Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Trademark Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 508
Progressive Pest Control v. McMillan
as 1:2017cv01969
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
OurPet's Company v. Nuvatek Distribution Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01853
Plaintiff:
OurPet's Company
Defendant:
Nuvatek Distribution Corporation, ClearPoint Direct
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
HDS Architecture, Inc. v. HDS Architecture, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01843
Plaintiff:
HDS Architecture, Inc.
Defendant:
HDS Architecture, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Extrusion Machinery and Equipment, Inc. et al v. Stopol Equipment Sales, LLC
as 1:2017cv01802
Plaintiff:
Extrusion Machinery and Equipment, Inc., Thermoforming Machinery and Equipment, Inc., Plastics Machinery Group, Inc
Defendant:
Stopol Equipment Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Noco Company v. HBG Distribution Inc.
as 1:2017cv01757
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
HBG Distribution Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Noco Company v. Protx Performance
as 1:2017cv01762
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Protx Performance
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Noco Company v. Amazing Deals Online
as 1:2017cv01759
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Amazing Deals Online
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Corehouse LLC v. Chorus Fitness, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01682
Plaintiff:
Corehouse LLC
Defendant:
Chorus Fitness, Inc., John Doe
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgment
High Tech National, LLC v. High-Tech Locksmiths, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01638
Plaintiff:
High Tech National, LLC
Defendant:
High-Tech Locksmiths, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Trademark
Noco Company v. Walker Distribution
as 1:2017cv01577
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Walker Distribution
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
