U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Deters v. Porotsky et al
as 1:2025cv00386
Plaintiff:
Eric Esquire Deters
Defendant:
Richard Porotsky and Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Williams v. City of Springfield et al
as 2:2025cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tyease Williams
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Lawrence County Prosecutor's Office, Lawrence County Municipal Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Stevens et al
as 1:2025cv00209
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jackson
Defendant:
David Stevens, The United States Government, State Of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hutton v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2025cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hutton
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00070
Plaintiff:
Major Sean Barnett
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., et al. v. Saba
as 1:2025cv00010
Plaintiff:
Timothy Vanbenthuysen, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Richard Redvanly
Defendant:
Paul T Saba, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Miller v. Hudson
as 1:2024cv00401
Defendant:
George Hudson
Plaintiff:
John Holsen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ponder v. Orsini
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Kisha Orsini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Walker
as 2:2024cv03746
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Zachary A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ponder v. Murphy
as 2:2024cv03743
Defendant:
Matthew Murphy
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
