Greer v. Harreld et al
Steven E. Greer |
Susan Harreld, Michael Harreld, Sr., Sarah Conroy Greer, Edward Bryan Greer, Cynthia Hall, Martha Greer, Nickolas McCoy, David Ison, Robert Dunn and Christopher Tacket |
1:2024cv00118 |
March 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Matthew W McFarland |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division of this Court at Columbus; (2) Plaintiff's motion for ECF filing rights (Doc. 2 ) is GRANTED; (3) Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall electronically file a First Amended Complaint that fully complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, that eliminates redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter, and that separately identifies the exhibi ts to the complaint as attachments to the complaint in the electronic record; (4) Upon transfer to the Columbus division, the Clerk of Court shall note the relatedness of Plaintiff's previously filed case, No. 2:22-cv-3443-SDM-CMV. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 3/18/2024. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.