US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 395
Shedd v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00281
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kelly Shedd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00181
Plaintiff:
Misty Dawn Long and Darren Wayne Long
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berryhill v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00132
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Allen Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00135
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Cecile Evans and Cecil Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00133
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Katherine Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cates v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00136
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kersey v. A.R.E. Accessories, LLC
as 4:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
John Kersey
Defendant:
A.R.E. Accessories, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childs v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00596
Plaintiff:
Wayne Childs, Jr
Defendant:
Pax Labs, Inc., Phillip Morris USA, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Tahsin Industrial Corp U.S.A. et al
as 4:2019cv00590
Defendant:
Ameristep Corporation, Primal Vantage Company, Tahsin Industrial Corp U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
John R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heape v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv00565
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tammy M Heape
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
