US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,708
Hill v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Rick Hill
Defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission and Anna Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RC v. Independent School District No. 2 of Osage County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00478
Defendant:
Independent School District No. 2 of Osage County, Oklahoma, Pawhuska Public Schools and Tori Madison
Plaintiff:
RC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coburn v. Kirbo et al
as 4:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carissa Marie Coburn
Defendant:
Krystal Kirbo, Key Renters, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cassel v. City of Pryor et al
as 4:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Cary Cassel
Defendant:
City of Pryor, Pryor Police Officer Couch, Sgt Tramel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
