US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,516
Brown v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Matthew Jason Brown
Respondent:
County of Tulsa and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owen v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv00349
Respondent:
Patterson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mitchell and others
Petitioner:
Lauren M Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Porter v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Shannon La'Shea Porter
Defendant:
Tulsa County and David L. Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spears v. Louthan
as 4:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Jared Michael Spears
Respondent:
Dave Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Harpe
as 4:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Melvin L Porter
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roark v. USA
as 4:2024cv00319
Petitioner:
Lance Douglas Roark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Self v. Harpe
as 4:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Self
Defendant:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Brown
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Judge Cliff Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00294
Petitioner:
Howard Eugene Peeples, Jr
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harjo v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Richard Harjo
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
