US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,560
Franks v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00595
Defendant:
Renee, Christine Brown and Carroll Lynn Whitney Smith
Plaintiff:
Avery Lloyd Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bello v. Linder et al
as 4:2024cv00593
Defendant:
Eastern District of Texas Pretrial Detention Services, City of Sulphur Spring, Mark L Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00590
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Petitioner:
Erik Sherney Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00576
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McCombs v. USA
as 4:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Sonny Raye McCombs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Conley v. USA
as 4:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Pamela Kathryn Conley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
King v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00570
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond
Petitioner:
Robert E King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cozart v. The District Court of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Defendant:
The District Court of Tulsa County and David Guten
Plaintiff:
Delmond Cornell Cozart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wytch v. Farris
as 4:2024cv00545
Respondent:
Jim Farris
Petitioner:
Stefon Wytch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sawyer v. Tinsley
as 4:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Melissa Sawyer
Respondent:
Scott Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
